<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>LawRiot - Latest Comments</title><link>http://lawriot.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://lawriot.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 16:36:51 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: July 2011 California Bar Exam Pass Rate by Law School</title><link>http://lawriot.com/2012/02/july-2011-california-bar-exam-pass-rate-by-law-school/#comment-720693479</link><description>&lt;p&gt;UCI's law school posted a 90% bar passage rate. &lt;a href="http://www.law.uci.edu/press_releases/11-20-12.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.law.uci.edu/press_releases/11-20-12.html"&gt;http://www.law.uci.edu/pres...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jennifer </dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 16:36:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spooner v. Reserve Life &amp;#8211; Case Brief</title><link>http://lawriot.com/2012/08/spooner-v-reserve-life-case-brief/#comment-712191719</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Bonus's should be "bonuses". Sorry, small detail but it was really bothering me. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kmolson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 16:48:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Law School’s Dirty Little Secret</title><link>http://lawriot.com/2011/09/law-school%e2%80%99s-dirty-little-secret/#comment-658003617</link><description>&lt;p&gt;what about people who cannot get into tier 1 schools? i am most likely looking at IU-Indy and would just like some feedback. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Laundrydetergent6</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 12:56:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: March 24, 2011 Law Revue/NCAA Picks</title><link>http://lawriot.com/2011/03/march-24-2011-law-revuencaa-picks/#comment-619131389</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very interesting legal case study. I know that here in Orlando, Florida Law; EA Sports went to battle Vs. the NCAA. That provided an interesting outcome as a group of retired NFL players won a $28.1 million judgment. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bankruptcy in Orlando</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:43:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What You Can Do To Prepare For Your First Year in Law School</title><link>http://lawriot.com/2012/08/what-you-can-do-to-prepare-for-your-first-year-in-law-school/#comment-614837272</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good advice. One other thing I'd say is....do something active and non-law related every day.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Law students do a lot of sitting around, but that doesn't mean that you should stay stationary when you close your books.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Going to the gym, taking a walk, and even just taking the stairs between library floors will give your mind a chance to refresh itself and process all that new information you're cramming into it, ensuring that your study time was indeed productive.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.toplawdegree.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.toplawdegree.com"&gt;www.toplawdegree.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:30:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sign the Student Loan Forgiveness Act of 2012 Petition</title><link>http://lawriot.com/2012/06/sign-the-student-loan-forgiveness-act-of-2012-petition/#comment-593117769</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I will gladly sign this petition. I hope that it makes it to the Federal Court of Appeals. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Federal Court of Appeals</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 08:32:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: July 2011 California Bar Exam Pass Rate by Law School</title><link>http://lawriot.com/2012/02/july-2011-california-bar-exam-pass-rate-by-law-school/#comment-591238130</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for your question! The California bar results come out in late November and schools begin to release their pass rates in December usually. However, the USNWR report does not come out until sometime in March and April. In order to get the results up the fastest, the rankings you see in the chart are based on the USNWR from 2011. The link to the USNWR webpage will always take you to the most updated rankings which is why they no longer match this chart which was posted in February 2012, prior to the release of the most recent rankings. I added a note in the article to account for that now. Thank you. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Allen DeVries - LawRiot</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 14:02:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: July 2011 California Bar Exam Pass Rate by Law School</title><link>http://lawriot.com/2012/02/july-2011-california-bar-exam-pass-rate-by-law-school/#comment-591041108</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You list Santa Clara as ranked 84th, but according to the link you provide they're ranked 96, and San Diego is ranked 65 by US News, not 67 (It looks like the US News list already accounts for multiple schools being ranked the same (UCLA and Vanderbilt at 16, for example), and skips ahead to the next school's number (going from two sixteens to an eighteen), so I'm wondering why your table has different numbers than the US News link.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">67-444</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 10:23:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What&amp;#8217;s On Your Bucket List? Man Tries To Out Run Cops Just For The Fun Of It</title><link>http://lawriot.com/2012/02/whats-on-your-bucket-list-man-tries-to-out-run-cops-just-for-the-fun-of-it/#comment-588884194</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That is impressive.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Galena Clark</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2012 20:23:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Filed Under “Stupid” – Woman Sues Little Leaguer</title><link>http://lawriot.com/2012/06/filed-under-stupid-woman-sues-little-leaguer/#comment-588253460</link><description>&lt;p&gt;God people these days. Seriously? If the balls coming at your face are you just going to stare it down hoping it will magically move out of the way or are you going to move yourself out of the balls path? Gravity isn't that hard to understand.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Galena Clark</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2012 23:13:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Average Day Studying for the Bar Exam</title><link>http://lawriot.com/2012/06/average-day-studying-for-the-bar-exam/#comment-555737132</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The ratios are all wrong, I spend way more time sleeping than that. Also, where's "working at Starbucks" and "figuring out new mathematical relations between the trajectories of upper-atmosphere projectiles and the trajectories of recapitalized interest on my student loans" ? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 21:48:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica Foundation &amp;#8211; Case Brief</title><link>http://lawriot.com/2010/08/federal-communications-commission-v-pacifica-foundation-case-brief/#comment-477711331</link><description>&lt;p&gt;so did the fcc win the case or did pacifica foundation?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eek</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:52:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins &amp;#8211; Case Brief</title><link>http://lawriot.com/2010/03/erie-r-co-v-tompkins-case-brief/#comment-472349748</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How can one decide this case without determining first whether or not the object that struck Tompkins was actually a part of the train or an unlatched door? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NDaniels</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 09:54:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Co. &amp;#8211; Case Brief</title><link>http://lawriot.com/2010/03/williams-v-walker-thomas-furniture-co-case-brief/#comment-457934948</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Was the case remanded or not? What happened when it was, if it was?&lt;br&gt;If it did not get reheard, why not? Any one can care to comment who &lt;br&gt;might know the final disposition of this case? I'd like to know. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jostlj</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 12:21:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Village of Belle Terre v. Boraas &amp;#8211; Case Brief</title><link>http://lawriot.com/2010/03/village-of-belle-terre-v-boraas-case-brief/#comment-436833295</link><description>&lt;p&gt;no, The dissent says the ordinance is unconstitutional. The majority finds it rationally related to the legitimate governmental purpose of keeping the noise down, and limiting the number of people in the streets, etc. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lucas Cuellar</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 10:39:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What&amp;#8217;s On Your Bucket List? Man Tries To Out Run Cops Just For The Fun Of It</title><link>http://lawriot.com/2012/02/whats-on-your-bucket-list-man-tries-to-out-run-cops-just-for-the-fun-of-it/#comment-434265983</link><description>&lt;p&gt;All he received was a $1000 fine? I'd be willing to do that now, wonder if you hit 160mph if that gets you jail time in comparison to 100mph.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Asdf</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:38:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Working with Senior Attorneys: Striking the Balance between Assertiveness and Deference</title><link>http://lawriot.com/2012/01/working-with-senior-attorneys-striking-the-balance-between-assertiveness-and-deference/#comment-414573298</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Spoken like a true intellect. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jess Birt</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:42:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Trickle Down Effect of Copyright Infringement</title><link>http://lawriot.com/2011/04/trickle-down-effect-of-copyright-infringement/#comment-400088953</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Illegally downloading a song, movie, or television show seems harmless and you’re only hurting those that are already millionaires who don’t need the money, right? Obviously this is untrue if you have even a basic understanding of how entertainment products are produced. All of those that help to make the final product depend on the revenues from sales for their salary to be paid. So, when you download the latest song or movie from a pirating site, you’re putting people out of work.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I’m not the first one to tell you, I certainly won’t be the last and at times the story can get old. However, it’s important and it’s real and the new campaign against infringement debuted with a video today.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Watch the video and read the Hollywood Reporter story HERE.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mardi_9504</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 23:13:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Take My Wallet, Take My Keys, but Don&amp;#8217;t Take My Laptop!</title><link>http://lawriot.com/2011/03/take-my-wallet-take-my-keys-but-dont-take-my-laptop/#comment-395708929</link><description>&lt;p&gt;First time this bullshit story was reported it was not "last week" in 2011 but in 2008. It has no credible source except the blogs of Right-wing morons and their dupes. Did not happen.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mbitsko50</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 09:19:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: California Bar Exam Pass Rates by School (July 2010 Exam)</title><link>http://lawriot.com/2011/01/california-bar-exam-pass-rates-by-school-july-2010-exam/#comment-377989608</link><description>&lt;p&gt;well they "know" how to spell "know" for one&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paper17</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 17:55:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: California Bar Exam Pass Rates by School (July 2010 Exam)</title><link>http://lawriot.com/2011/01/california-bar-exam-pass-rates-by-school-july-2010-exam/#comment-372269597</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If I were a bar taker, I'd be happy as long as I pass. My school's passing rate wouldn't matter much to me. Besides, the best part of life in the field of law is the satisfaction and fulfillment people get from it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guy Chambliss</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:47:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: California Bar Exam Pass Rates by School (July 2010 Exam)</title><link>http://lawriot.com/2011/01/california-bar-exam-pass-rates-by-school-july-2010-exam/#comment-372235379</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Awesome!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 13:23:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: California Bar Exam Pass Rates by School (July 2010 Exam)</title><link>http://lawriot.com/2011/01/california-bar-exam-pass-rates-by-school-july-2010-exam/#comment-369178456</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with Lou. Sometimes law schools rank higher/better just because they are attached to a big school that has other programs besides law, such as undergrad and other professional schools.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 01:02:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Orange County Superior Court Rules in Contentious Medical Marijuana Case</title><link>http://lawriot.com/2011/09/orange-county-superior-court-rules-in-contentious-medical-marijuana-case/#comment-367745382</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Shortly thereafter, Congress authorized the creation of the National Commission on Marijuana and Drug Abuse to study the risk of marijuana use. The commission's report to Congress in 1972 was titled “Marijuana, &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marijuana Abuse </dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 14:08:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GWU Law &amp;#8220;F*** You&amp;#8221; Youtube Music Video (Caution: Language)</title><link>http://lawriot.com/2011/02/gwu-law-f-you-youtube-music-video-caution-language/#comment-363808553</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hellz yeah you guys are the badist asses in the world F* YOU LAW REVIEW, hahaha arrogant pricks&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wesleybholl</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 12:14:37 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>